Recent editorials from Mississippi newspapers:


Jan. 12

Jackson Free Press on a group of Republican lawmakers from Mississippi who joined the unprecedented challenge to President-elect Joe Biden's election win:

Mississippi and the nation must hold U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith and Reps. Trent Kelly, Steven Palazzo and Michael Guest accountable for their complicity in the lies that Donald Trump has used to foment fear, doubt and, ultimately, insurrection.

If they can’t bring themselves to tell the truth about the election and apologize to the American people, they should resign. As it stands, their efforts to thwart democracy make them unfit to serve.

Hyde-Smith, Kelly, Palazzo and Guest joined six other Republican senators and 136 Republican representatives as elected officials who put their loyalty to one extremely flawed and mercilessly dishonest man—Donald Trump—ahead of their loyalty to the United States of America and our democracy.

Just as the domestic terrorists who rioted in the Capitol will come to regret the hubris that caused them to announce their lawlessness in videos and selfies on social media, so too will these “Sedition Caucus” members, as many Americans are calling them, come to understand that being a sycophant for an anti-democratic liar is not a source of pride, but shame.

We hope that the damage to our democracy ends at the Capitol invasion that took place on Jan. 6, 2021. But there’s a very real chance that it won’t, particularly as so many Republicans in Mississippi and elsewhere are intent on continuing to lie to their constituents about the 2020 election, while insisting that others “move on” from the egregious assault in the Capitol in D.C. in the name of “unity.”

So far, they’ve engaged in the opposite of unity by putting votes on the record that prop up the same lies that fired up domestic terrorists to go to Washington, D.C., invade the U.S. Capitol, try to hunt down national leaders and their staff members, steal and destroy property and cause numerous deaths, including a Capitol Police officer.

Leadership is about leading people in an honest direction—even when the truth is painful, such as during an election loss—not down a dishonest path that can get your followers to kill and be killed and imprisoned, leaving families destroyed while creating a dangerous mythology that can, in turn, cause more violence and continue to divide our nation.


These elected Mississippi public servants must now be honest with their constituents that their guy lost. Big. He lost by the largest popular percentage against an incumbent since 1932. And he lost the Electoral College by more than the “landslide” that he called his win in 2016.

Why? Because a ton of Americans want Trump out of the White House and his hands off the nuclear codes. They want a POTUS who doesn’t foment hate and division on Twitter. Many Americans feel his lack of leadership has damaged our health, our economy, our democracy and the reputation of our precious and amazing republic.

To admit the truth of Trump’s electoral loss is American. To foment fear, dissent and ignorance based on Trump’s lies is un-American. That’s where the Sedition Caucus finds itself today.

Trump organized a rally at the White House, told supporters how wronged he and they were, commanded them to march on the Capitol, lied to them that he would be there with them and exhorted them to “stop the steal.” (His personal attorney told them to wage a “trial by combat.”)

Then Trump went back inside the White House to watch his work on TV.

The Sedition Caucus? They back him with their words and their votes. They still won’t tell the truth. They voted for the lies just hours after Trump’s supporters had stolen laptops, broken windows, terrorized police and staffers, and smeared excrement on the walls of the building they sat in.

The violence last week—and any further violence, God forbid—is on the Sedition Caucus. They have the power right now to calm their constituents down. They are not elected to lie at any cost and foment violence and division; they represent all the people in their districts.

They must start telling the truth.


Let’s start with the facts. After the Capitol incursion, when lawmakers bravely returned to the smashed and ransacked seat of U.S. government, the majority of Mississippi’s GOP delegation still voted to overturn the Electoral College votes in Arizona and Pennsylvania.

These elected officials did this knowing the following:

- Like all of the states in the union, Arizona and Pennsylvania are constitutionally empowered to run their own presidential and vice-presidential elections.

- No evidence existed to show that those states’ Electoral College votes had not been “regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified,” which is the only legal role the U.S. Congress plays in these races.

- Arizona and Pennsylvania both have state legislatures run by Republicans, while Arizona has all three government branches controlled by Republicans, including the governor. Those states certified their electors. It’s bizarre that Mississippi Republicans would question that.

- Nationwide, no evidence has been presented throughout the process to suggest that (a) there was anything approaching sufficient voter fraud to change the outcome of the election, much less a single state’s results, or (b) that the states and courts that heard cases or confirmed the outcome are unqualified to do so or have been rendered incapable of doing so fairly. The only outlier we have in this election is that Donald Trump is willing to lie vigorously about things that are demonstrably not the case. He says he won. He says it was a landslide. He says it was stolen. He’s lying.

Since the objections and votes of the Sedition Caucus don’t otherwise make sense, we conclude that they voted to unconstitutionally overturn the Electoral College count in Arizona and Pennsylvania in order to aid and comfort Donald Trump as he continues to lie about this election.

Trump retains power and sway over certain of these elected officials’ constituents. Through their complicity with his lies, they’re helping him.

Trump’s lies are the words he has used to foment rebellion among his supporters and, ultimately, led to terrorists storming the Capitol, chanting “hang Mike Pence”; stating their desire to kill Speaker Nancy Pelosi; killing, beating and seriously injuring police officers; terrorizing staff and elected officials; stealing government property; and gleefully desecrating one of the institutions of American democracy like it was an out-of-control white supremacists house party.


Storming the Capitol to overturn a legitimate election is the very definition of treason. For his sedition, Trump deserves impeachment and, ideally, to face charges once out of office.

Propping up the man using those lies to try to cling—violently—to power, despite his clear loss in a democratic election, is aiding and abetting. And it’s shameful.

It’s unconscionable to now continue the deadly charade, emboldening other such violence. No one should remain in office who will not acknowledge the lies that caused the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Hyde-Smith, Kelly, Palazzo and Guest—your oath is to the Constitution, not to a flawed and failed president who lost his election by an insurmountable margin.

Step up and admit that the election was not stolen. Tell us why you supported Trump’s lies and ask forgiveness for breaking your oath of office. Lead.

Or step down. Resign your office for the good of the state and nation.

It’s time for the lies to end. That’s the only glimmer of hope we have for unity.



Jan. 12

The Greenwood Commonwealth on supporters of President Donald Trump accusing social media companies of censorship:

President Trump and his supporters are crying foul after social media companies such as Twitter banned him from using their platforms. They’re complaining that this is unfair and illegal censorship.

Given the apparent misunderstanding of what censorship means, a review of the topic might be helpful.

Start with a definition. Censorship is the act of reviewing any form of communication “for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds,” as the website puts it. Censorship is most powerful when a government uses it.

This can be a local school board banning “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” because of the book’s language that is offensive to modern readers, or the federal government restricting battlefield information during wartime.

But broadly speaking, there’s not a whole lot of government censorship in America anymore. That’s the Constitution’s First Amendment in action. It says governments cannot restrict the freedom of speech.

Most censorship is self-imposed by the people who create the communication. Examples include the movie industry’s morals code from the 1930s to the 1950s, and the decision by most newspapers and broadcasters to avoid foul language or extremely violent imagery so as not to offend their customers.

The problem is what happens when the communications middleman gets removed, and anybody can say whatever they want with little fear of retribution or a lawsuit. This is exactly what’s been going on with social media for years.

If there is anyone who has thrived from a lack of speech restriction, it is the president. He’s used Twitter to promote himself — first his TV show and now his administration, to denigrate his opponents, to fire his secretary of state and others, and to sell his image as a tough guy to his millions of fans. Clearly, it worked.

But last week’s abhorrent trashing of the U.S. Capitol flipped an online switch. Twitter banned the president, fearing he will use the service to incite violence when Joe Biden is sworn into office.

Twitter’s decision is not censorship. It is not the government preventing someone from speaking out. It is a private company deciding it no longer wishes to allow someone to use its services. There’s a big difference.

Every newspaper, every radio station, every television broadcaster commits a form of censorship every day when it decides not to pay attention to information it has received. This decision might be for space or time limitations, or the judgment that the information will not interest its audience. In every case, it is the communicator’s First Amendment right not to use the information. The sender has no legal right to demand that it be used.

It’s the same thing with social media. The president is certainly the highest-profile person that Twitter has banned. But just as this newspaper gets to decide what information goes onto its pages, Twitter gets to decide who can use its platform.

There’s really no debate about this. Trump fans can complain that Twitter or any other company is being unfair, and that may be true. But the First Amendment does not require fairness in its protections of speech and media rights.

Most likely, Twitter and other social media companies are taking action because they worry the government will make them liable for the content people put on the companies’ platforms. They need to worry: If last week proved anything, it’s that the social media volume is out of control.



Jan. 11

Gazebo Gazette on taking COVID-19 vaccines:

The first question that should be asked for each person is would you like to return to the world of February 2020? If your response (without other conditions) is yes, then the best and only option is to take the COVID-19 Vaccine twice.

It is acknowledged that this is a choice matter; however, if your sincere interest would be to have immunity from the deadliest global pandemic of our generation, then you probably should consider this option once you are eligible.

Let’s look at the theories against the vaccine and the true science or explanation which should invalidate each one.


According to the BBC News, the biggest misconception is the work on the COVID vaccine started when the pandemic began. The central piece of the COVID plan was a revolutionary style of vaccine known as “plug and play”. It has two highly desirable traits for facing the unknown – it is both fast and flexible.

Additionally, Pfizer and Moderna (the drug companies that created the vaccines) were given billion contracts by the United States federal government to produce a solution. It may be seen as a gamble, but apparently it works.


Serious side effects from vaccines are extremely rare. For example, if 1 million doses of a vaccine are given, 1 to 2 people may have a severe allergic reaction. Keep in mind that getting vaccinated is much safer than getting the diseases vaccines prevent.


While seven trial users did develop Bell’s palsy — which weakens or paralyzes facial muscles — after being vaccinated, the FDA says there’s no reason to believe the vaccine was the cause as it’s a common, and likely temporary, condition. Four patients in the Pfizer vaccine trials also experienced Bell’s palsy at various times afterward, with the longest time period being over a month and a half. The seven who developed the condition is well below that average.The best advice is to ignore social media for news and gather your health care information from your doctor or health care provider. Although it is admirable to review public safety and health care online, very few facts can be accredited and should not be recommended without having a discussion with doctor of healthcare provider.

Post-World War II population and life expectancy have increased because of the education we have accomplished and the proficiency we have in science today. One of the most accurate statements is that knowledge is power.