Recent editorials from Alabama newspapers:


June 15

The Times-News on combatting summer “quarantine fatigue”:

We all have a bad case of quarantine fatigue. We are tired of living in what feels like lockdown limbo. The weather is warmer, summer is here — at least it will be officially Saturday. It’s me to take that family vacation and hit the water to unwind.

A word of caution. As of June 15, Chambers County has a positive COVID-19 case count of 461 with 26 confirmed deaths. For those of us following along, just 14 days before, that number was at 358. Over a hundred new cases in a two-week period are somewhat staggering, even if it’s probably a slower pace than we had before.

We do know that self-quarantines, lockdowns, social distancing, mask-wearing and proper handwashing work to slow the spread. We saw it first hand as millions of Americans flipped their lives upside down for weeks, and in some cases months, to protect themselves and their loved ones from this highly contagious virus.

We still do not know all that we need to know about COVID-19. We still do not have enough testing kits available.

Too much, too soon and little precautions may make the summer look a lot like Easter 2020 did.

We are not saying to crawl back inside your homes and hibernate once again. We are, however, saying take every necessary precaution and recommendation seriously.

None of us want to see this virus regain momentum and ruin our summer any more than it has already.

We also want to see schools be able to return to session as close to normal as possible. Another wave of this will undoubtedly put that timeline in jeopardy.



June 14

Florence Times Daily on who should get to decide the fate of Confederate monuments:

In the South they are almost everywhere, from cemeteries to roadsides to town squares. They pop up in surprising places elsewhere, too — as far west as California and as far north (until recently) as Washington State.

They are statues, memories and historic markers dedicated to the Confederacy, its leaders and the common men who fought and died for it.

Now many of them are coming down, and there is a clamor for the rest to join them.

This is all an outgrowth of the protests that have broken out across the country — and across the world — following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a Minneapolis police officer.

This was it seems inevitable, especially given the wave of Confederate symbol removals that followed the 2015 mass shooting in Charleston, South Carolina, in which a white supremacist barely out of his teens opened fire in an African American church and killed nine people.

Afterward, the Confederate battle flag finally came down from atop the South Carolina state capital. Then Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley had the Confederate flags surrounding a memorial on the state Capitol grounds removed, and the city of Birmingham began looking at removing a monument to Confederate Soldiers and Sailors erected in 1905.

For every action, there is a reaction, so the Alabama Legislature responded to this by passing the Alabama Memorial Preservation Act of 2017, which requires cities and counties to obtain state permission before removing or altering any monument more than 40 years old. The law carried a $25,000 fine.

While the law is not limited to Confederate monuments, protecting them was its obvious goal, and the law kicked off a legal battle between Birmingham and the state. The all-Republican Alabama Supreme Court upheld the law unanimously.

Following Floyd’s death and demonstrations that have focused on the deaths of other African Americans at the hands of law enforcement, Birmingham decided to remove the monument anyway. Alabama’s attorney general has said he will sue the city, which has simply led to citizens raising money to pay the fine.

Other cities and counties, including Florence, are now considering the same route, fine or no fine. Clearly the time to act is now, before the state Legislature comes back into session and raises the fine or enacts other penalties.

This is how the fate of Confederate monuments — of all monuments — should be decided: by the democratically elected governing bodies of the cities and counties where these monuments stand. Grandstanding state lawmakers should not force communities to keep monuments they no longer want, for causes in which their residents to not believe, nor should the fate of these monuments be left to protesters.

America has to come to terms with its past. Some monuments should stay, but others must go. Some can be retired to museums. Perhaps the U.S. can have a museum of toppled statues, like the one in Hungary filled with the symbols of Soviet occupation.

But the process should be democratic and local, reflecting the values of those most directly involved. That would be a testament to how much the nation has progressed since the 19th century, even if we still have a way to go.